Entries Tagged 'Announcement' ↓

Through SWIM (Sloan Women in Management) I recently had the opportunity to breakfast with Ann Moore, CEO of Time Inc. First of all, she’s got a fire-y personality! You can imagine the things she had to fight through working at Sports Illustrated, Fortune, and People back in the 70’s. There was one thing that I remember so clearly - Real Simple, the magazine, was an idea that was born out of one piece of data they found - women were spending 45 minutes every day just LOOKING FOR STUFF. Hey, that’s me! She launched the magazine in 2000 to help women organize their lives so they can have time to do other things. Good stuff.

Since yesterday I’ve noticed some strangeness going on with my Google search results - the UI looks different. It turns out I’m part of an experiment that brings “Digg” to search results. For example, I can promote a search result or bury it. As far as I can tell not every one has this feature ‘turned on’ and you can only know if you’re logged in.

This is the biggest product change I’ve seen on Google Search and I can’t tell if I like it or not. On the one hand, I think I might enjoy commenting on links so when I encounter it again later I can retrace thoughts. And I can’t wait to bury all those lame squatter sites / sites that have no content value. On the other hand, I don’t want to add complication and more work to my search experience. I like the simplicity exemplified by Google’s single search box. I type in something, results come back, done.

Also, at the moment my actions only affect my own search results. Will whatever I promote/bury be useful for even myself, given there is _so much_ on the web? I don’t really need help with the easy search terms like ‘Sandy Lin’ or ‘MIT Sloan’. Which means the only way for this to be useful is if all user actions collectively affect search results.

Indeed, the faq for Edit search results implies collective search edit might come in the future.

It’s been a week since Diane Greene’s abrupt departure from VMware. From my position on the fringes of the ‘inside’, the news was a shocker for every one. Mostly it was shocking for how it was done, not for it being done at all. People have been expecting her to be replaced by some one more ‘experienced’ for a while now, albeit in a more amiable fashion.

I personally like Diane, think it’s unfair, and am sad to see her go. I like the idea of a woman CEO, an engineer’s CEO, and a founder CEO all wrapped up in one - and was rooting for her to keep leading the company into competition with Microsoft. I even secretly enjoy her awkward public speaking skills - which always made me chuckle at the absurdity of the situation. She spoke to us at MIT last semester - during the Q&A session, she kept on interrupting a student who was in the middle of asking a question because new things popped into her head on a previous train of thought. This happened at least 3 times before he was able to finish his sentence. Poor guy - he must have prepped that question in his head many times only to have Diane ruin the moment for him.

During that same class session, some one raised the question of her relationship with Joe Tucci, CEO of EMC. At least back then she was politically savvy enough to say Tucci and her are cool and he’s leaving VMware alone to do its thing i.e. she told us nothing about the real situation. Now, it looks like some thing was brewing all along -

Fair or not, given EMC’s background, when a female CEO gets canned from the wildly successful company she founded and helped steer to its “unsatisfactory” 49% growth, and her “inexperience” and “lack of execution” are cited as the reasons, the tongues are going to wag.

In the end, she’s done a fantastic job. So much of the business-leader image is a smooth-talking MAN in a suit; but here she was kicking ass for years. I still remember how impressed I was when I first used the VMware desktop product at FactSet to reproduce some annoying Adobe Acrobat plug-in bugs. It’s awesome.

The Team Fusion blog mentioned about academic pricing for VMware Fusion today for $39.99. Well, for those lucky Beavers out there, MIT has a site license for a host of VMware products, including Fusion. Couple that with a free student copy of your choice of poison - Windows XP or Vista - there really is no additional software cost to switch from a PC to a Mac and have access to all those necessary Windows-only apps (like Crystal Ball Predictive Modeling software for those DMD problem sets).

MIT students can download VMware products from the distribution site here.

This summer I’m interning in Product Marketing for VMware Fusion.

See me on the Team Fusion blog here.

I remember when I first got the email from VMware HR in the spring about a position in Product Marketing, I thought to myself, “What are the chances this is for Fusion?” Lo and behold, a day later I get an email signed “Pete Kazanjy. Product Marketing Manager, VMware Fusion”. Now Fusion is a fantastic product, but it’s a tiny fraction in terms of revenue share amongst VMware’s bevy of enterprise desktop and server products. I thought: maybe they saw my blog post earlier last year on VMware Fusion vs. Parallels. Or they saw my face on the Fusion Page on Facebook. Yeah, right. It was just one of those happy coincidences that really should happen more often in life.

After a few emails, a phone call, and a visit to Palo Alto, I’m here marketing the product. It’s awfully nice to work on a product that you actually use and love. As a recent Mac convert, I often get asked about dealing with the learning curve of a new OS and specifically choosing VMware Fusion or Parallels. And without being paid, I’ve always said VMware Fusion.

But, as a gamer, I’ve always suggested new Mac users to run their virtual machine off their BootCamp partition. Now the updated advice is to run a real virtual instance of Windows and keep a lightweight version on Boot Camp for the gaming itch. The main reason being you can suspend a real virtual machine, making it much faster to access when you need it.

More on my summer experience to come!

Getting a SlingBox was simply the best purchase decision I made in the last 3 months, especially as a frequent traveler. Technically it’s a gift for Henry but I seem to be reaping the rewards (typical Sandy gift buying strategy). Now that it’s connected to his DVR in New York, I can catch up on Project Runaway and Top Chef or watch a football game from anywhere with an internet connection… pretty sweet eh?

Once before Henry has gotten the mobile SlingPlayer working on his Samsung BlackJack, but no longer since the trial expired and it costs $29.99 - shame on Sling Media.

In fact, I look forward to the day we don’t even need to stream from home and take up unnecessary bandwidth. Instead we’d just stream from a central server or even peer-to-peer to get better quality.